Stimulation Package: A Rousing Proposal
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009
Ohhhhh...Bama
The government’s large economic-recovery endowment, a formidable program, designed to rouse the economy and bring long-term prosperity to the American economy was initially met with much criticism. Some felt that the banking industry had loose morals and was unfit for government intervention. Others felt that intervention was inevitable. One CNN correspondent commented that the package “was a little bit of a tease at first, many were unsure if the Senate would really go all the way.” However, the recently passed $288 billion bill has proven that the government still got a way with the banks.
Some more insatiable banks claim that they will require much more stimulation and have made many desperate and pathetic attempts to win Obama’s attention. “Citi has been drunk-dialing me at all hours of the night. Bank of America even showed up at my bedroom window singing “In Your Eyes,” Obama recounted. Though banks have acknowledged their bad choices, they insist that they’ve gotten their “toxic assets looked at, and it’s really not that bad.” Citi’s latest text-message to the president at 3:00 a.m. explained, “the experts say that I can still lead a normal life and that my toxic assets won’t spread if we’re careful.”
The economic crisis has revealed the true colors of some institutions. AIG, for example, who had claimed to be down-to-earth in the “About Me” section on Facebook has proven to be frivolous and self-centered in the current recession environment. In their Match.com, profile AIG posted inaccurately attractive pictures and wrote, “honesty is key in any relationship, I enjoy volunteering and helping the needy.” In a recent Tweet, the government called AIG “a high-maintenance gold-digger who thinks that losing a yacht qualifies a person as needy.” Obama has exhausted all the social networking sites with pleas to get his money back as well as to berate the jilted institution.
The Obama Administration and the Senate have been steadily denying the possibility of long-term stimulation to any bank saying, “we haven’t had a talk about commitment. We’re just not ready to ask anyone to nationalize yet. I mean there are a lot of very attractive banks out there, we’ve just got a thing for the needy kind with a lot of baggage.”